Will it be any comfort to you to know that when you’re gone my only happiness will be in knowing I’m sharing your loneliness?

13th Academy Awards (1940)
Nominated:
1) Best Supporting Actress (Barbara O’Neil)
2) Best Black-and -White film
3) Best Motion Picture.
Maybe a year ago when I first started to appreciate Bette Davis films, I watched this movie. I was captivated by the acting, costumes and the storyline. This movie is based on the novel with the same title by Rachel Fields, which the author based on true events.

The movie starts with a woman played by Bette Davis, Henriette Deluzy-Desportes, being introduced to a class of young American girls. The girls treat her with disrespect because there have been many rumors and gossip circulating regarding Henriette’s past. She wants the girls to understand the untold side of her story.
She was once employed as a governess to the four children of Charles Laure Hugues Theobald, a nobleman with the title Duc de Choiseul-Praslin and his wife Frances Altarice Rosalba Sebastiani. Why the complicated names? The movie, after all, takes place in Paris in the 1800s.
Duc de Praslin and Duchess de Praslin have been stuck in loveless marriage for many years and have stayed together, for the sake of their children and to avoid scandal. Their children: Isabelle, Luis, Beth, and little Renald are far from happy from the constant neglect of their mother.
The Duchess de Praslin took a stroll with her youngest child, Renald, after Henriette’s warning that Renald is not feeling to well. Only a few days on the job and Henriette was already telling the Duchess what to do – this did not fly by too well with the Duchess. She ignored her protest.
When the two return, Renald complains of his pains and ailments. This soon escalades to, what I think is pneumonia. If it were not for the nurturing love and care that Henriette and his father provided, the poor kid would have greeted the grim reaper.

From then on, Duke de Praslin has grown to love Henriette because she has something that his wife did not posses – compassion. If it were not for her, he would not be spending so much time with his children who are in desperate need of love from at least of their parents. More than one occasion, he had to control his urges and love towards her. Even though Henriette’s feelings for the Duke increase every time she is with him, she had to keep it professional between the two for the sake of the children.
The uncontrollable Duchess is filled with intense jealousy and hate towards Henriette, her competitor for her children and husband’s affection. The hostile woman fires her employee and refuses to give her a letter of recommendation. The Duchess’ argument behind the method to her madness is she is protecting future employers’ family from a gold-digging woman who will potentially ruin a family.
But what the Duchess does not realize is that from the start, long before Henriette entered the picture, her family was already broken mainly because of her own doing. She neglects her children and is hostile towards her husband thus putting a strain on the family.

(angry Duchess. Yikes!)
When the Duke asks if she has written the letter for his lost love, she of course, lies and says she did so. The only consolation for not being with Henriette is knowing that she is doing fine on her own and not facing any type of struggle. The Duke and his children visit Henriette in the room that she is renting. He was surprised that she was not yet employed since he thought she had a letter of recommendation. He was furious at this wife when he heard that she lied to him about the letter.
When he returned to his home he begged, pleaded, bribed, blackmailed, reasoned, bargained, and any other methods that would force his wife to write the letter. Not shaken by his threats or flattered with his pleas, she still stood by her original position.
The duchess should have written the letter because I think that she’s going to regret it later. She screams as her husband chases her with a gun, where the audience is left to believe that he murder his wife. That’s what you get for being unreasonable.
Everything started to spiral down for the Duke. His children were taken away from his custody and placed under the care of a relative in another country. The Duke was arrested and well as Henriette who actually had no idea of the Duchess’ death until the police took her under custody. Since the Duke held such a high, respectable position in society, speculation of love between the Duke and his governess became known to the public, being the headline of every newspaper in the country. Such scandal! But from what the movie depicted, their love is nothing of the such because they never pursued it. But in the history books, it may say the opposite. Who know?

The Duke refuses to confess to his crime nor does he openly express his love for Henriette. He does this to protect her from being arrested. He knows that if he were to confess to the crime, the police would try to link her to the crime. It does look pretty suspicious – a wife murdered, and a husband who loves another woman. In order to prevent the secret to come out, the Duke committed suicide by taking large dosages of poision. Since the police could no longer tie Henriette to the crime she was freed.
The little American felt the heartache and sadness their teacher felt. All of them cried and asked for her to pardon their ignorance. The end.
The storyline was interesting – it’s the classic tale of forbidden love. The dialogue is so poetic, every line has a certain sweetness but this could counteract since at times, I did feel that it was overdone.
Oh my, Charles Boyer is one handsome actor! I think it’s his accent that makes you melt. My main motivation to watch to this film was because Bette Davis, one of my favorite actresses, was in it. This was the first Charles Boyer movie I saw. I’m proud to say that because of this movie, he is one of my favorite actors.

I love how his face can appear serious but soft at the same – in a way, it also appears misunderstood. This must have helped him throughout his acting career.
Bette Davis’ character in the film was pretty much expressionless mainly because her character is suppose to be very wise, virtueous, and honorable – kind of like a prude. Yet Davis puts warmness in the character, especially in the scenes where she and Charles Boyer’s character were together.
Barbara O’Neil, who played the Duchess, was satisfactory in her performance. I felt somewhat uncomfortable watching her play a nasty bitchy character manily because it seemed forced and unnatural to the actress. How and why she was nominated for supporting actress, is a puzzle to me. Thank goodness, she did not take home that Oscar.
Such a pity it did not win Best Motion Picture but I think its worthy for Oscar.

This movie was actually running against Charlie Chaplin’s The Great Dictator for Best Motion Picture (I reviewed that movie in an earlier post. So, check it out!)

(Richard and Mildred Loving)



VS.

